Received 04/12/2023
DOI: 10.35556/idr-2024-1(106)20-23

Analysis of the reasons for patient dissatisfaction with prosthetics on dental implants

Gilmanova N.S.1, ORCID ID: 0000-0002-9024-7837,
Rudova A.I.1, ORCID ID: 0009-0001-5298-8992,
Chkadua T.Z.2, ORCID ID: 0000-0001-8270-8843,
Belozerova N.N.3, ORCID ID: 0000-0002-1753-0599,
Yurkevich K.Y.1, ORCID ID: 0009-0009-2259-6865

1I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical Universi-ty (Sechenov University), E.V. Borovsky Institute of Dentistry, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry
119991, Russia, Moscow, Trubetskaya St., 8, Bld. 2
2I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical Universi-ty (Sechenov University), E.V. Borovsky Institute of Dentistry, Department of General Dentistry
119991, Russia, Moscow, Trubetskaya St., 8, Bld. 2
3Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “Russian University of Medicine” of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Department of Cariesology and Endodontics, A.I. Yevdokimov Institute of Dentistry
127006, Russia, Moscow, Dolgorukovskaya St., 4

E-mail address: gilmanova_natali@mail.ru

Summary
The purpose of this study: identification of the main complaints of patients during orthopedic dental treatment using dental implants, followed by the development of recommendations to eliminate the identified errors in prosthetics on implants.
Material and methods. The study included 19 patients (15 women and 4 men) who filed complaints in 2023 after orthopedic treatment using dental implants. 137 screw dental implants were installed in these patients. Of these, 58 implants are on the upper jaw, 79 implants are on the lower jaw.
Results. As a result of the study, it was revealed that in 100% of cases, the patients who complained had non-removable orthopedic structures based on dental implants, and the percentage of types of orthopedic structures in those who applied was established. It was found that the most frequently recurring complaints were loose closure of the dentition, difficulty chewing food, as well as aesthetic disorders.
Conclusions. The analysis made it possible to identify as the main complaints of patients loose closure of the dentition and difficult digestion of food. Recommendations are given to take a more careful approach to the definition of central occlusion and correction of occlusive relationships when planning treatment.

Keywords: prosthetic dentistry, dental implantation, complications, implant, prosthetics, fixed prostheses, removable prostheses.

For citation: Gilmanova N.S., Rudova A.I., Chkadua T.Z., Belozerova N.N., Yurkevich K.Y. Analysis of the reasons for patient dissatisfaction with prosthetics on dental implants. Stomatology for All / Int. Dental Review. 2024; no.1(106): 20—23 (in Russian). doi: 10.35556/idr-2024-1(106)20-23

References
1. Kopeikin V.N. Mirgazizov M.Z., Malyi A.Yu. Errors in orthopedic dentistry. Professional and medico-legal aspects. Moscow: Medicine; 2002; 240 p. (in Russian).
2. Lebedenko I.Yu., Kalivrajiyan E.S. Orthopedic stomatology: textbook. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2016; 640 p. (in Russian).
3. Paraskevich V.L. Analysis of the main clinical concepts of dental implantation. Clinical Implantology and Stomatology. 1997; no.1: 60–64 (in Russian).
4. Shashmurina V.R. Errors and complications of treatment of patients with the use of dental implants and complete removable prostheses. Moscow: MEDpress-Inform; 2017; 96 p. (in Russian).
5. Yurkevich K.Y., Zekiy A.O., Yumashev A.V., Matveeva E.A., Gilmanova N.S. Types of prosthetic constructions in patients with complaints after prosthetics on dental implants. Institute of Stomatology. 2022; no.3: 66–67 (in Russian).
6. Yurkevich K.Y., Gzyunova Y.A., Maly A.Yu. Brovko V.V. Dynamics of appeals and complaints of patients on HCC associated with prosthetics on dental implants. Russian Stomatology. 2018; no.2: 40–41 (in Russian).
7. Gilmanova N.S., Mikhailova M.V., Gilmanova A.I., Yurkevich K.Yu. et al. Anatomy and Histology of Human Teeth. Fundamentals of biomechanics of the dentoalveolar system. Moscow, 2023 (in Russian).
8. Yurkevich K.Yu., Zekiy A.O., Gilmanova N.S. Analysis of the reasons of the patients’ dissatisfaction at the prosthetics on the dental implants. Institute of Stomatology. 2022; no.2: 46–47 (in Russian).
9. Samusenkov V.О., A.L. Makarov, A.S. Utuj, S.R. Belous. Rational approaches to prosthetic treatment of patients with diseases of the oral mucosa. Stomatology for All / International Dental Review. 2014; no.2: 52–54 (in Russian).