Received 10.11.2022.

DOI: 10.35556/idr-2023-2(103)58-63
Clinical observations of metal brackets detachment using a Russian adhesive complex
Khasan A.M., ORCID ID: 0000-0001-5671-2240, Kosyreva T.F., ORCID ID: 0000-0003-4333-5735, Tuturov N.S., ORCID ID: 0000-0001-8048-5703, Katbeh I., ORCID ID: 0000-0002-4591-7694, Gharawi A.M., ORCID ID: 0000-0003-3279-4119, Salman I., ORCID ID: 0000-0003-1461-8365
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia” (RUDN University), Medical Institute
Russia, 117198, Moscow, Miklukho-Maklaya St., 6

E-mail address: alexander.khasan@mail.ru

Summary
People are increasingly paying attention to their smile and occlusion. That led to the emergence of new adhesive materials, including domestic ones. The purpose of this study is to define the indicators of detachment of brackets from three companies during clinical observation within one year after their fixation using the domestic set “Compofix (ortho)”. The study included 30 patients who had brackets fixed on both jaws on 24 teeth (from the first molar of one segment to the first molar of the opposite segment). The patients were divided into three groups: Group I included 10 patients who were fixed with brackets from Equilibrium (Dentaurum, Germany). Group II included patients who were fixed with G&H Orthodontics brackets (G&H Wire Company, USA). Group III included patients with Hangzhou brackets (JET Medical Equipment Co., Ltd China, China). Fixation in all groups was performed according to one adhesive protocol using the “Compofix (ortho)” orthodontic kit (Vladmiva, Russian Federation). The indicators were distributed as follows: Group I (12.5%) Group II (5.83%) Group III (28.75%). The study showed that G&H Orthodontics brackets (G&H Wire Company, USA) showed the best fixation to tooth enamel. Hangzhou brackets (China) showed the worst indicators of fixation to tooth enamel. The domestic complex “Compofix (ortho)” showed positive clinical indicators of fixation.

Keywords: adhesion, Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI), bonding system, brackets.

For citation: Khasan A.M., Kosyreva T.F., Tuturov N.S., Katbeh I., Gharawi A.M., Salman I. Clinical observations of metal brackets detachment using a Russian adhesive complex. Stomatology for All / Int. Dental Review. 2023, no.2(103): 58-63 (In Russian). doi: 10.35556/idr-2023-2(103)58-63

References
1. Cardoso R.M., Godinho J., Jardim L. Bond strength of orthodontic brackets to polymethylmethacrylate: effect of the surface treatment and adhesive system. 2021.
2. Sharma R., Kumar D., Verma M. Deproteinization of fluorosed enamel with sodium hypochlorite enhances the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets: An In vitro study. Contemporary clinical dentistry. 2017, 8(1): 20.
3. Newman G.V. Epoxy adhesives for orthodontic attachments: progress report. Am J Orthod. 1965, 51(12): 901—912.
4. Buonocone M.G. A simple method of increasing the adhesion Mm filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res. 1955, 34: 849—853.
5. Bowen R.L. Adhesive bonding of various materials to hard tooth tissues. II. Bonding to dentin promoted by a surface-active comonomer. J Dent Res. 1965, 44(5): 895—902.
6. Bearn D.R., Aird J.C., McCabe J.F. Ex vivo bond strength of adhesive precoated metallic and ceramic brackets. Br J Orthod. 1995, 22(3): 233—236.
7. Alakttash A.M., Fawzi M., Bearn D. Adhesive precoated bracket systems and operator coated bracket systems: Is there any difference? A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Angle Orthodontist. 2019, 89(3): 495—504.
8. Grunheid T., Larson B.E. A comparative assessment of bracket survival and adhesive removal time using flash-free or conventional adhesive for orthodontic bracket bonding: A split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial. The Angle Orthodontist. 2019, 89(2): 299—305.
9. Faltermeier A., Rosentritt M., Faltermeier R., Reicheneder C., Mussig D. Influence of filler level on the bond strength of orthodontic adhesives. Angle Orthod. 2007, 77: 494—498.
10. Mavropoulos A., Karamouzos A., Kolokithas G., Athanasiou A.E. In vivo evaluation of two new moisture-resistant orthodontic adhesive systems: a comparative clinical trial. J Orthod. 2003, 30: 139—147.
11. Cal-Neto J.P., Miguel J.A. An in vivo evaluation of bond failure rates with hydrophilic and self-etching primer systems. J Clin Orthod. 2005, 39: 701—702.
12. Cal-Neto J.P., Quintao C.A., Almeida M.A., Miguel J.A. Bond failure rates with a self-etching primer: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009, 135: 782—786.
13. Reynolds I.R. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod. 1975, 2: 171—178.
14. Frankenberger R., Lopes M., Perdigao J. et al. The use of flowable composites as filled adhesives. Dent Mater. 2002, 18: 227—238.
15. Artun J., Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod. 1984, 85: 333—340.
16. Badar S. et al. Comparison of Shear Bond Strength Between Pre-Coated and Non-Coated Orthodontic Attachments: An Ex Vivo Study. NeuroQuantology. 2022, 20(6): 4372—4379.
17. Bril E.A., Smirnova Ya.V. Frequency of occurrence of dental anomalies and deformities during the formation of the bite. Modern problems of science and education. 2014, 6: 42—46.
18. Grudyanov A.I. Changes in the composition of the microflora of the dental sulcus in the process of orthodontic treatment. Dentistry. 2012, 3: 61—64.
19. Pavlovskaya Ya.V., Gioeva Yu.A., Tsarev V.N. et al. Diagnosis of the composition of periodontopathogenic microflora in patients in need of orthodontic treatment using the molecular genetic PCR method. Orthodontics. 2013, 4(64): 6—8.
20. Modina T.N., Mamaeva E.V., Tsinekker D.A. Features of the formation of chronic hypertrophic gingivitis in adolescents aged 13-15 years. Pediatric dentistry and prevention. 2013, 2: 28—34.
21. Ulitovsky S.B. Professional hygiene program of dental health. Saint Petersburg: Man, 2011, 132 p.
22. Ulitovsky S.B. Hygiene in orthodontics. Saint Petersburg: Man, 2012, 152 p.
23. Ulitovsky S.B., Chp V.V., Antipova A.V., Aleskerov D.Sh., Domorad A.A., Yakovleva O.M. Clinical and laboratory evaluation of the effectiveness of gum balms in the complex treatment of inflammatory periodontal diseases. Stomatological scientific and educational journal. 2012, 3/4: 2—7.
24. Ulitovsky S.B. New approaches to caries prevention. Clinical dentistry. 2014, 4: 20—24.
25. Demirovic K. et al. Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets using direct and indirect bonding methods in vitro and in vivo. Acta Informatica Medica. 2018, 26(2): 125.
26. Baidas L. et al. Effects of Antioxidants on the Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Bonded to Bleached Human Teeth: An In Vitro Study. The journal of contemporary dental practice. 2020, 21(2) 141.