Received 30/04/2024
DOI: 10.35556/idr-2024-3(108)32-38
Stress-strain state of an intraosseous dental implant under stress under unfavorable biomechanical conditions
Bersanova M.R.1 ORCID ID: 0009-0004-6150-148X,
Olesov E.E.2, Bersanov R.U.1, Olesova E.A.3, Grishkov M.S.4, Zaslavsky S.A.5
1Kadyrov Chechen State University
364061, Russia, Chechnya, Grozny, A. Sheripova St., 32
2Academy of postgraduate education under FSBU FSCC of FMBA of Russia
125371, Russia, Moscow, Volokolamskoe HWY, 91
3Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “Russian University of Medicine” of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
127006, Russia, Moscow, Dolgorukovskaya St., 4
4University of Medicine and Biology for Innovation and Continuing Education State Scientific Center «Federal Medical Biophysical Center named after A.I. Burnazyan» FMBA of Russia
123098, Russia, Moscow, Marshala Novikova St., 23
5Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Further Professional Education «Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education» of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
125993, Russia, Moscow, Barrikadnaya St., 2/1, Bld.1

E-mail address: zsa.gdg@gmail.com

Summary
Biomechanical conditions affect the stress-strain state of teeth, dentures, implants and surrounding tissues, however, some biomechanical processes in implants and covering prosthetic structures have not been sufficiently studied under different operating conditions.
The purpose of the study. А comparative analysis of the maximum stresses in titanium implants, abutments and covering ceramic crowns under different biomechanical operating conditions.
Material and methods. Three-dimensional mathematical modeling of the stress-strain state of the implant, abutment, crown was carried out using the SolidWork computer program in a model of an implant immersed in a segment of the mandible and covered with a ceramic crown. Load conditions: vertical or inclined 45° with a value of 150 N. Well-known indicators of the physical and mechanical properties of fabrics and structural materials were used. Adverse biomechanical conditions were simulated: a 30% reduction in the length, diameter, length and diameter of the implant; an abutment slope of 15° and 30°; bone resorption by 30% and 50%; increased load by 30%; occlusive supracontact; contact with bone tissue by 50% (immediate load).
Results and discussions. In comparison with optimal biomechanical conditions, the stresses in the implant and the covering crown increase under vertical and inclined loads only with an increase in load and the presence of occlusive supracontact. An increase in stresses only in the implant occurs with a decrease in the diameter of the implant, a combined decrease in the diameter and length of the implant, with an abutment tilt, resorption of periimplant bone tissue, incomplete contact of the implant with bone tissue under immediate load. Stress reduction in the implant and the covering crown occurs when the length of the implant decreases.
Conclusions. Unfavorable biomechanical conditions in most cases lead to an increase in stresses in the implant, especially with inclined loading; the decrease in stresses in the implant with a decrease in the length of the implant is most likely due to an increase in stresses in the surrounding bone tissue.

Keywords: implant, load, stress.

For citation: Bersanova M.R., Olesov E.E., Bersanov R.U., Olesova E.A., Grishkov M.S., Zaslavsky S.A. Stress-strain state of an intraosseous dental implant under stress under unfavorable biomechanical conditions. Stomatology for All / Int. Dental Review. 2024; no.3(108): 32-38 (in Russian). doi: 10.35556/idr-2024-3(108)32-38

References
1. Weitz T.V. Evaluation of an integrated approach to the formation of the occlusal surface of the crown of the tooth using computer technology. Clinical dentistry. 2021; 24(3): 6–11 (in Russian). doi: 10.37988/1811-153X_2021_3_6
2. Bulycheva D.S., Postnikov M.A., Bulycheva E.A., Ishchenko T.A., Ignatieva A.A. Combined treatment of patients with masticatory muscle hypertension using elastic bands and mouthguards. Dentistry. 2021; 100(1): 30–33 (in Russian). doi: 10.17116/stomat202110001130
3. Bogatov E.A., Uruj A.S., Zekiy A.O. Reduction of excessive occlusal load on the dental implant in order to prevent complications of orthopedic treatment. Theory and practice of modern science: a collection of articles of the International Scientific and Practical Conference. 2020. pp. 150-152 (in Russian).
4. Kalamkarov A.E., Kostin I.O. Features of the distribution of occlusive loads in bone tissue in the orthopedic treatment of patients with complete absence of teeth using dental intraosseous implants. Stomatology for All / Int. Dental Review. 2014; № 3(68): 27–29 (in Russian).
5. Dental implantation: national leadership (Edited by A.A. Kulakov). Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2022; 400 p.
6. Orthopedic dentistry. Volume 1: National Leadership: in 2 volumes (edited by I.Y. Lebedenko, S.D. Arutyunov, A.N. Ryakhovsky). 2nd ed., re-slave. and additional M: GEOTAR-Media, 2022; 520 p. (in Russian).
7. Ivanov A.S., Olesova V.N., Maksyukov S.Yu., Salamov M.Ya., Zaslavsky R.S., Ragulin A.V., Olesov E.E. The structure of prosthetic structures based on dental implants in dynamics over 20 years. Russian Dental Journal. 2021; 25(1): 5–12 (in Russian).
8. Muzikin M.I., Kulakov A.A., Iordanishvili A.K., Slesarev O.V., Terletsky D.V. Comparative assessment of the survival rate of dental implants in conditions of severe bone atrophy. Russian Bulletin of Dental Implantology. 2023; 60(2): 43–52 (in Russian).
9. Jiang X., Yao Y., Tang W., Han D., Zhang L., Zhao K., et al. Design of dental implants at materials level: An overview. Journal of biomedical materials research. 2020; 108(8), 1634–1661.
10. Hingsammer L., Pommer B., Hunger S., Stehrer R., Watzek G., Insua A. Influence of Implant Length and Associated Parameters Upon Biomechanical Forces in Finite Element Analyses: A Systematic Review. Implant dentistry. 2019; 28(3), 296–305.
11. Prados-Privado M., Martinez-Martinez C., Gehrke S.A., Prados-Frutos J.C. Influence of Bone Definition and Finite Element Parameters in Bone and Dental Implants Stress: A Literature Review. Biology. 2020; 9(8), 224.
12. Ichikawa H., Yoda N., Ogawa T., Iwamoto M., Kawata T., Egusa H., et al. Impact of implant location on load distribution of implant-assisted removable partial dentures: a review of in vitro model and finite-element analysis studies. International journal of implant dentistry. 2023; 9(1), 31.
13. Rozov R.A., Trezubov V.N., Gvetadze R.S. and others. Experimental modeling of the functional load of the mandible during implant-supported prosthetics in adverse clinical conditions. Stomatology. 2022; 101(6): 28–34 (in Russian).