Received 13/05/2024

DOI: 10.35556/idr-2024-3(108)40-44
Factors affecting osseointegration of dental implants (literature review)
Dragunkina O.V., ORCID ID: 0009-0000-5662-147Х,
Bayrikov I.M., ORCID ID: 0000-0002-4090-5918
Federal State Budgetary Institution of Higher Professional Education «Samara State Medical University» of the Ministry of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
443099, Russia, Samara, Chapayevskaya St., 89

E-mail address: dmib@samsmu.ru

Summary
The article’s material based on sources from peer-reviewed scientific journals on the issues of osseointegration of dental implants. The main factors influencing the process of osseointegration: composition and surface of the implant, bone density, general health of the patient, primary stability of the implant, hygiene, and the impact of physiotherapeutic methods. The last factor requires special attention due to how insufficiently it’s been studied.

Keywords: osseointegration, implant composition, implant surface, primary stability of the implant, vibration-pneumatic stimulation in implantation.

For citation: Dragunkina O.V., Bayrikov I.M. Factors affecting osseointegration of dental implants (literature review). Stomatology for All / Int. Dental Review. 2024; no.3(108): 40-44 (in Russian). doi: 10.35556/idr-2024-3(108)40-44

References
1. Global oral health status report: towards universal health coverage for oral health by 2030. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
2. Panahov N.A., Mahmudov T.G The stability level of dental implants in different periods of functioning. Actual problems in dentistry. 2018; 14(1): 89–93 (in Russian). doi: 10.24411/2077-7566-2018-000017
3. Guskov A.V., Mitin N.E., Zimankov D.A., Mirnigmatova D.B., Grishin M.I. Dental implants: state of the question today (literature review). Clinical Stomatology. 2017; 82(2): 32–34 (in Russian).
4. Rony L., Lancigu R., Hubert L. Intraosseous metal implants in orthopedics: a review. Morphologie. 2018; 102(339): 231–242. doi: 10.1016/j.morpho.2018.09.003
5. Albrektsson T., Buser D., Sennerby L. Crestal bone loss and oral implants. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res. 2012; 14(6): 783–791. doi: 10.1111/cid.1201316
6. Albrektsson T., Canullo L., Cochran D., de Bruyn H. “Peri-Implantitis”: A Complication of a Foreign Body or a Man-Made “Disease”. Facts and Fiction. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res. 2016; 18(4): 840–849. doi: 10.1111/cid.12427
7.Lobanov E.V. The evolution of the “osseointegration” concept and a review of the features of modern dental implants affecting osseointegration. Pathogenesis. 2023; 21(1): 16–21 (in Russian). doi: 10.25557/2310-0435.2023.01.16-21
8. Wennerberg A., Albrektsson T., Chrcanovic B. Long-term clinical outcome of implants with different surface modifications. Oral Implantol. 2018; 11 Suppl 1: S123–S136.
9. Beer A., Gahleitner A., Holm A., et al. Correlation of insertion torques with bone mineral density from dental quantitative CT in the mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003; 14: 616–620.
10. Nishiguchi S., Kato H., Neo M., et all. Alkali- and heat-treated porous titanium for orthopedic implants. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2000; 54(2): 198–208. doi: 10.1002/1097-4636(200102)54:2<198::aid-jbm6>3.0.co;2-7
11. Stogov M.V., Emanov A.A., Kuznetsov V.P., et all. Comparative evaluation of osseointegration of new percutaneous implants made of Ti Grade 4 ultrafine‑grained alloy. Orthopaedic Genius. 2023; 29(5): 526–534 (in Russian). doi: 10.18019/1028-4427-2023-29-5-526-534
12. Morandini Rodrigues L., Lima Zutin E.A., Sartori E.M., et al. Nanoscale hybrid implant surfaces and Osterix-mediated osseointegration. Biomed Mater Res A. 2022; 110(3): 696–707. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.37323
13. Vinnichenko O.Yu. Methods of alveolar bone density assessment and its value for long-term prosthetic functioning. Stomatology. 2016; 95(4): 83–86 (in Russian). doi: 10.17116/stomat201695483-86
14. Dmitriev A.Yu., Gvetadze R.Sh., Dmitrieva N.A. Hygienic assessment of the implant-gingival joint in patients with implant-supported orthopedic appliances. Stomatology for All / Int. Dental Review. 2017, no. 3 (80): 28–32 (in Russian).
15. Mayborodin I.V., Shevela A.A., Marchukov S.V., et al. Regeneration of the bone defect at experimental application of extracellular microvesicles from multipotent stromal cells. Novosti khirurgii. 2020; 28(4): 359–369 (in Russian). doi: 10.18484/2305-0047.2020.4.359
16. Baroyan M.A., Parshukova A.I., Ivanova S.S. Changes occurring in bone tissue after the installation of a dental implant. Regional Bulletin. 2020; 7 (46): 10–11 (in Russian).
17. Jiang N., Xia W. Assessment of bone quality in patients with diabetes mellitus. Osteoporos Int. 2018; 29: 1721–1736. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4532-7
18. Pandey C., Rokaya D., Bhattarai B.P. Contemporary Concepts in Osseointegration of Dental Implants: A Review. Biomed Res Int. 2022; 2022: 6170452. doi: 10.1155/2022/6170452
19. Starkova A. S., Sarkisyan A. A., Khabadze Z. S., et all. The influence of hormonal therapy on osseointegration of dental implants. Modern Science: actual problems of theory and practice. 2019; no. 4: 185–190 (in Russian).
20. Lepilin A.V., Raigorodsky M.Yu., Bulkina N.V., etc. The use of dynamic magnetotherapy using the AMO-ATOS-E apparatus in the pre- and postoperative treatment of periodontal diseases. Stomatology. 2007; 86(4): 25–28 (in Russian).
21. Aghaloo T., Pi-Anfruns J., Moshaverinia A., et all. The effects of systemic diseases and medications on implant osseointegration: a systematic review. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 2019; 34: 35–49. doi: 10.11607/jomi.19suppl.g3
22. Mikhail F.F., El-Din M., Ibrahim T., et al. Effect of Laser Therapy on the Osseointegration of Immediately Loaded Dental Implants in Patients under Vitamin C, Omega-3 and Calcium Therapy. Med Sci. 2018; 6(8): 1468–1474. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2018.291
23. Pettersen E., Anderson J., Ortiz-Catalan M. Electrical stimulation to promote osseointegration of bone anchoring implants: a topical review. Neuroeng Rehabil. 2022; 19(1): 31. doi: 10.1186/s12984-022-01005-7
24. Patent of the Russian Federation for invention No. RU 180219 U1/ 03/26/2018. Byul. No.16. Sirant L. B., Bayrikov I. M., Kulakov S. A. Medical vibro-pneumatic stimulator for influencing the maxillofacial region.
25. Dregalkina A.A. Kostina I.N., Shimova M.E., Schneider O.L. Inflammatory diseases of the maxillofacial region. Modern features of the clinical course, principles of diagnosis and treatment: A textbook. Yekaterinburg: Publishing House “Tiraj”; 2020; 108 p.
26. Liu X., Chen S., Tsoi J. K.H., Matinlinna J.P. Binary titanium alloys as dental implant materials-a review. Regen. Biomater. 2017; 4: 315–323. doi: 10.1093/rb/rbx027
27. Zhang M., Matinlinna J.P., Tsoi J.K.H., Liu W., et al. Recent developments in biomaterials for long-bone segmental defect reconstruction: a narrative overview. Orthop. Translat. 2020; 22: 26–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2019.09.005
28. Romanos G.E. Present status of immediate loading of oral implants. Oral Implantol. 2004; 30: 189–197.
29. Ye X., Gu Y., Bai Y., et all. Does Low-Magnitude High-Frequency Vibration (LMHFV) Worth for Clinical Trial on Dental Implant? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Animal Studies. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021; 9: 626892. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.626892
30. Huang C., Narayanan R., Alapati S., et all. Exosomes as biomimetic tools for stem cell differentiation: Applications in dental pulp tissue regeneration. Biomaterials. 2016; 111: 103–115. doi: 10.1016j.biomaterials.2016.09.029
31. Vasilyuk V.P., Chetvertnykh V.A. Optimization of integration of jaw bone tissue by cellular structures made of titanium impregnated with ascorbic acid. Stomatology for All / Int. Dental Review. 2023, no. 1(102): 62–67 (in Russian). doi: 10.35556/idr-2023-1(102)62-67