Received 27.01.2022
DOI: 10.35556/idr-2022-1(98)34-37

Reasons for refusal of repeated prosthetics on implants according to the results of a patient survey
Zaslavsky R.S.¹, Olesov E.E.², Ivanov A.S.³, Zaslavsky S.A.⁴, Romanov A.S.¹
¹ Biomedical University of Innovation and Continuing Education of State Research Center – Burnasyan – FMBC
123098, Russia, Moscow, Zhivopisnaya Ulitsa, 46 , bldg.8
² Academy of postgraduate education under FSBU FSCC of FMBA of Russia
125371, Russia, Moscow, Volokolamskoe Sh.,91
³ Dental clinic of the Rostov-on-Don
344022, Russia, Rostov-on-Don, Pushkinskaya Ulitsa, 211
⁴ Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Further Professional Education “Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education” of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
123242, Russia, Moscow, Barrikadnaya Ulitsa, 2/1
Е-mail address: gdg-russia@bk.ru

Summary
The main purpose of this study was to analyze the reasons for refusal of repeated prosthetics on implants of patients with removed implants. The analysis of the causes of such failures was carried out in 118 patients with removed implants with a period of 5—20 years of previous use of prostheses on implants. For 46 patients with repeated prosthetics were shown covered dentures on implants, 14 — fixed dentures with complete absence of teeth, 58 — fixed dentures with partial absence of teeth. To analyze the reasons for refusal of prosthetics on implants, a questionnaire of 16 questions was developed and used.
As a result of the study, it was found that the main rea sons for the refusal of patients from re-implantation are the insufficient period of functioning of prostheses on implants due to the development of chronic inflammation around the implants, the high cost of prosthetics on implants and insufficient good health, constraining the decision on surgical interventions and complex prosthetics are a problem.
Significant factors for refusing implantation were also noted: the duration of the prosthetics process on implants, the reluctance of additional bone-plastic surgery, insufficient esthetics of fixed prostheses on implants.
More than half of the refusals from implantation in the complete absence of teeth are due to the impossibility of non-removable prosthetics.
Keywords: removal of implants, repeated prosthetics, refusal of implantation, causes.

For citation: Zaslavsky R.S., Olesov E.E., Ivanov A.S., Zaslavsky S.A., Romanov A.S. Reasons for refusal of repeated prosthetics on implants according to the results of a patient survey. Stomatology for All / Int. Dental Review. 2022, no.1(98): 34-37 (In Russian). doi: 10.35556/idr-2022-1(98)34-37

References
1. Dental implantation. National leadership. (A.A. Kulakov, Ed.). Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2018., 400 p. (In Russian).
2. Orthopedic dentistry. National leadership (I.Yu. Lebedenko, S.D. Arutyunov, A.N. Ryakhovsky, Ed.). Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2022, 520 p. (In Russian).
3. Olesova V.N., Bronstein D.A., Grishkov M.S., Zakharov P.A., Pechenikhina V.S. Long-term results of the analysis of the state of peri-implant tissues depending on the conditions of dental implantation. Russian Bulletin of Dental Implantology. 2017, no.1: 13—17 (In Russian).
4. Olesova V.N., Bronstein D.A., Stepanov A.F., Kalinina A.N., Lashko I.S. The frequency of development of inflammatory complications in peri-implant tissues according to remote clinical analysis. Dentist. Minsk, 2017, no.1: 58—62 (In Russian).
5. Olesova V.N., Bronstein D.A., Uzunyan N.A., Fedorov A.V., Novozemtseva T.N. Statistics of complications during operation for 10 years of prostheses on implants. Proceedings of scientific and practical conference with international participation “Modern dentistry and splinter-facial surgery”. Kiev, 2017, 184—187 (In Russian).
6. Dental prosthetics on implants (V.A. Zagorsky, T.G. Robustova, Ed., 2nd edition supplemented). Moscow: Binom, 2016, 368 p. (In Russian).
7. French D, Cochran D, Ofek R. A retrospective cohort study of 4591 Straumann system implants placed in 2060 patients in private practice up to 10 years of follow-up: relationship between crestal bone level and soft tissue condition. PERIO IQ. 2017, no.28: 22—42 (In Russian).
8. Steigmann M, Bollak W. Orthopedic-induced peri-implantitis: 25 years of experience in implant-supported prosthetics. PROlab IQ. 2019, no.22.: 16—31 (In Russian).