Received 02.08.2022
DOI: 10.35556/idr-2023-1(102)32-36 The review of studies on the bonding of metal brackets to tooth enamel and ceramics
Khasan A.M., ORCID ID: 0000-0001-5671-2240, SPIN-Code 3249-3712;
Kosyreva T.F., ORCID ID: 0000-0003-4333-5735;
Tuturov N.S., ORCID ID: 0000-0001-8048- 5703
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia” (RUDN University), Medical Institute
Russia, 117198, Moscow, Miklukho-Maklaya St., 10/2

E-mail address:

In our paper, we present a review of modern laboratory studies conducted on the topic bonding strength of brackets using adhesive systems. The main objective of this article is to study the structure of studies, the methods used and the results that were obtained. We selected scientific papers that compared the adhesion of metal braces with tooth enamel and ceramics, using various primers and adhesives. All studies that we selected were published no earlier than 2018. This article analyzes the methods of laboratory experiments, the samples used and the results obtained on the basis of these tests. The result of our review is the conclusion that it is possible to use an additional method to determine the adhesion force of a bracket with tooth enamel and orthopedic materials.
Conclusions are drawn that in the analyzed works all the indicators of adhesion of braces with enamel are in the same range, the adhesion of braces with ceramics is lower compared to adhesion with tooth enamel, there is no data on laboratory studies of the adhesion strength on the separation of braces from tooth enamel and ceramic orthopedic structures.
Keywords: adhesives, ceramics, enamel, metal brackets.

For citation: Khasan A.M., Kosyreva T.F., Tuturov N.S. The review of studies on the bonding of metal brackets to tooth enamel and ceramics. Stomatology for All / Int. Dental Review. 2023, no.1(102): 32-36 (In Russian). doi: 10.35556/idr-2023-1(102)32-36

1. Boldyrev Yu.A., Gerasimovich I.S. Aesthetic restoration of teeth as a form of beauty. Ural Dental Journal. 2011, no.2: 4—6 (In Russian).
2. Goldstein R. Aesthetic dentistry. Vol. 1. Moscow: StBook, 2003: 420—422 (In Russian).
3. Shumsky A.V. Conversations about aesthetic restoration of teeth: a practical guide. Samara, 2015: 249—252 (In Russian).
4. Karakov K.G., Eremenko A.V., Shumilina V.A., Khachaturian E.E., Lavrinenko V.I., Vanchenko N.B. Evaluation of the effectiveness of oral hygiene in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment. Modern problems of science and education. 2016, no.5: 175—176 (In Russian).
5. Karakov K.G., Vlasova T.N., Ohanyan A.V., Eremenko A.V., Khachaturian E.E., Mordasov N.A., Tsurova M.A., Seiranidou Z.A. Priority approach in periodontal therapy. Scientific almanac. 2015, no.10-3(12): 329—333 (In Russian).
6. Vinakov D.V., Chuev V.P. Comparative assessment of shear strength of orthodontic adhesives. Dentistry of Slavic states. 2018: 47—48 (In Russian).
7. Robakidze N.S., Zhidkikh E.D., Zaitseva A.G. Modern concepts of adhesive dentistry. Institute of Dentistry. 2021, no.3(92): 76—79 (In Russian).
8. Martalia C. et al. The comparison of shear bond strength of metal orthodontics bracket to porcelain surface using silane and single bond: An in vitro study. Journal of International Oral Health. 2020, 12(5): 470.
9. Bishara S.E., Oonsombat C., Ajlouni R., Laffoon J.F. Comparison of the shear bond strength of 2 self-etch primer/adhesive systems. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2014, 125: 348—350.
10. Reynolds I.R. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod. 1975, 2: 171—178.
11. Webster M.J., Nanda R.S., Duncanson M.G., Khajotia S.S., Sinha P.K. The effect of saliva on shear bond strengths of hydrophilic bonding systems. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2001, 119: 54—58.
12. Cacciafesta V., Sfondrini F., Angelis M.D., Scrinbante A., Klersy C. Effect of water and saliva contamination on shear bond strength of brackets bonded with conventional, hydrophilic, and self-etching primers. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2003, 123: 633—640.
13. Oztoprak M.O., Isik F., Sayinsu K., Arun T., Aydemir B. Effect of blood and saliva contamination on shear bond strength of brackets bonded with 4 adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2007, 131: 238—242.
14. Zachrisson B.J. A posttreatment evaluation of direct bonding in orthodontics. Am J Orthod. 1977, 71: 173—189.
15. Gwinnett A.J. Bonding of restorative resins to enamel. Int Dent J. 1988, 38: 91—96.
16. Sreeshna P. et al. Evaluation of shear bond strength of two light cure adhesives with three different primers: A comparative in vitro study. 2020.
17. Frankenberger R., Lopes M., Perdigao J. et al. The use of flowable composites as filled adhesives. Dent Mater. 2002, 18: 227—238.
18. Hadrous R., Bouserhal J., Osman E. Evaluation of shear bond strength of orthodontic molar tubes bonded using hydrophilic primers: an in vitro study. International Orthodontics. 2019, (17)3: 461—468.
19. Sharma P. et al. Effects of different adhesion promoters and deproteinizing agents on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets: An in vitro study. Journal of orthodontic science. 2020, 9.
20. Madaparambil V. et al. Effect of adhesion boosters on the shear bond strength of new brackets bonded to a debonded tooth surface — An In vitro study. Contemporary Clinical Dentistry. 2020, (11)1: 46.
21. Singh S. et al. Assessment of the Effect of Adhesion Boosters on Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets on Bleached Teeth.
22. Plyaskina E.S., Popova E.S., Petrova A.M. Bracket system and enamel demineralization. Topical issues of dentistry. 2018: 83—91 (In Russian).
23. Petrova N.P., Saunina A.A. Review of publications devoted to the study of oral microbiota in orthodontic treatment. Institute of Dentistry. 2018, no.1: 95—97 (In Russian).
24. Alexikova O.V. Influence of the composite orthodontic adhesive system enlight (ormco) on the acid resistance of tooth enamel. Volgamedscience. 2019: 288—289 (In Russian).
25. Kharaeva Z.F. et al. Comparative analysis of the adhesive properties of microorganisms on various surfaces of bracket systems. Clinical dentistry. 2019, no.2: 42—44 (In Russian).
26. Shmeleva E.A. et al. Stabilization of symbiosis of the oropharyngeal microecosystem. Problems of medical mycology. 2020, (22)3 — Theses: 151 (In Russian).
27. Egorova A.V., Tereshchuk O.S., Osbanova N.G. The choice of a method for removing orthodontic adhesive residues based on the study of the microstructure of tooth enamel. Bulletin of the Dagestan State Medical Academy. 2020, no.1: 43—49 (In Russian).
28. Sokolovich N.A. et al. The influence of orthodontic treatment on the condition of hard tissues of teeth, prevention of complications. Medical Alliance. 2021, no.2: 56—62 (In Russian).
29. Ilyasova N.V. et al. Comparative analysis of the surfaces of cohesive bond breakage in multilayer systems. Scientific and Technical Bulletin of St. Petersburg State Polytechnic University. Physical and mathematical sciences. 2022, (15)1: 62—69 (In Russian).
30. Alqaisy A. et al. Evaluation of the effect of sodium hypochlorite gel on composite bonding strength to enamel of primary teeth after salivary contamination: in vitro study. Stomatologiia. 2021, (100)1: 15—18.